« Wow, That Hurts | Main | TLT Symposium and Hubs of Activity »

04/05/2007

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Carla

I am concerned that results of studies like the one that was recently released by the Department of Education will be overextended to make a case for not integrating technology into K-12 schools. While I completely agree that in and of themselves the tools (in this case, educational software) don’t “raise test scores” (I have a problem with this paradigm, too, but that’s another rant…), high quality technology tools in the hands of well educated teachers who know how to use them to support learning is something that warrants further consideration and investigation. In some ways, there is nothing new about this study. Teachers who understand students, learning, subject matter, and the tools make all the difference in the world. However, it is motivating for me to consider further how to make the best use of technology to support learning and teaching, provide effective professional development for teachers, AND conduct carefully designed research that examines more than test score results. Sorry it’s such a long story just to say that we need to play with your idea, Cole, and pay close attention not only to what we do, but what we learn from it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17956093/

Cole Camplese

Carla, let's go for it. Clearly we could pack some serious content into an educational deployment of these things. I wonder what kind of displays they are putting in K12 classrooms these days.

Looks like Apple is obviously thinking the same thing. Thanks for the link Jason. I wonder if they'd be interested in seeing it in action? Are there schools already doing this?

Carla

I am concerned that results of studies like the one that was recently released by the Department of Education will be overextended to make a case for not integrating technology into K-12 schools. While I completely agree that in and of themselves the tools (in this case, educational software) don’t “raise test scores” (I have a problem with this paradigm, too, but that’s another rant…), high quality technology tools in the hands of well educated teachers who know how to use them to support learning is something that warrants further consideration and investigation. In some ways, there is nothing new about this study. We know that teachers who understand students, learning, subject matter, and the tools make all the difference in the world. However, it is motivating for me to consider further how to make the best use of technology to support learning and teaching, provide effective professional development for teachers, AND conduct carefully designed research that examines more than test score results. Sorry it’s such a long story just to say to say that we need to play with your idea, Cole, and pay close attention not only to what we do, but what we learn from it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17956093/

Jason

http://www.apple.com/education/products/ipod/appletv.html

Carla

I wrote the proposal in my head based on your comments. Let's run a pilot in a local school and see what happens. I know a few people who would be very interested -- at PSU and SCASD.

Rick Burkett

A progressive, technology enthusiast here...former public school teacher/administrator now working in a smaller private school with opportunity to create and shape technology-integrated instruction as budget will allow. Anyway, I am excited by the possibilities of Apple TV, but I am missing something, I think. What is the advantage of Apple TV over simply hooking up a Macbook to a projector and projecting onto a large screen within the classroom? If I have a wireless connection, I have access to internet content and can play it via Quicktime or iTunes. Why should I make the leap to Apple TV as an educational tool? What are the advantages? Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this site!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Categories