« Some Interesting Stuff | Main | A Thought? One Post a Day. »

07/26/2008

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

D'Arcy Norman

cole, no snarkiness detected. I was being a bit tongue-in-cheek, and what I was really trying to point out that it really doesn't matter what tools are picked anymore. You can pretty much make any of them do anything. So now that you have an enterprise-scale MT system at your beck and call, it should be pretty cool seeing what faculty, students and staff doing with it. It's a personal content management and publishing system, not a blog.

D'Arcy Norman

so... it only took 2 years to get MT to offer some of the basic WordPress CMS functionality? sweet. ;-)

Reginald Golding

All a blog does is collect words, like all a hammer does is bang nails. You're limited only by the diversity of thoughts that get connected, like you're limited only by the designs of houses you build.

Very exciting work from some very simple tools; and it's just the beginning.

Cole Camplese

Well, one could look at it that way. But, you could also look at it as a place where it is easy for the 99% of our users who need simplicity, scale, and support.

D'Arcy Norman

yeah yeah. I kid. mostly. when you launched blogs@psu, wordpress was nowhere near able to handle what you needed. it's been pretty cool seeing what you guys have worked up with MT. truly impressive. The cool thing now is that the exact technology really doesn't matter anymore - just use whatever tool is available, and bend it to do your bidding. That's a powerful thing.

Cole Camplese

Ok D, so all snarkiness aside (on my part) ... I've used WP as my primary publishing platform for years (not as long as some, but for some time now) ... I also use it as the primary platform for the main ETS site. I know how to make it do stuff, but most don't. Maybe WP multiuser allows for "template sets" so everyday casual users can just click and get a fully customizable space -- like the website structure demoed ... or the dozens of other kinds of spaces people ask for us all the time. Maybe it can, but I haven't seen it in action.

I also know that even with the shortcomings of MT, it fits our infrastructure really well. Every one of our projects are built around compromises and the Blogging project is no different. We want to desperately to avoid the "box mentality" when provisioning services -- we have real physical space constraints and don't even get me started on our power and cooling issues. We have killer infrastructure in place to allow faculty, staff, and students with web space and publishing options that work for public, private, groups, courses, and so on that not linking these would be a downstream mistake. I know WP can publish static pages and we investigated it ... MT works for us and the excitement we have for it all is centered around affordances -- not tools. I am urging people to look more at the the new ground we are attempting to cover and not focus on the feature sets. Sorry if my post or comments came off wrong.

You are right in that these tools have become so powerful anything can be done with them. I like that there is competition and parity in the personal publishing space. Things are really getting set to heat up

The comments to this entry are closed.

Categories